A (somewhat serious) review of three shoes I wear/have worn: The Luna Mono, The Altra Olympus and the Hoka Mafate 2
So, I used to run in the Hoka Mafate’s, I’ve been running in the Luna Mono’s for about 6 months and just got my pair of Altra Olympus’ and I thought to myself: Has anyone reviewed/compared the 3? A quick search showed a scattering of reviews, but none that compared all three, so I decided to take on the task for others, like me, that are looking for guidance in a sea of choices. Arguably, all three are different in their own way, but there are a lot of similarities that make the comparisons less than ridiculous.
My conclusion is at the end of this brief review, so if you’re the impatient type, you can scroll down. ☺
First: The look
The first thing you’ll notice when wearing any of these three shoes is that other people will tend to stare. Both the Hokas and the Altras put you on a platform a few inches above the normal running rabble and the sheer volume of the shoes causes looks. The Luna’s, while garnering a slightly different response, still score high on the gaping stare spectrum, especially when worn when it’s cold outside.
Next: The feel
For me, this is one of the key differentiators and the reason why I’d choose one over the others. The Hokas have great cushioning, but my foot sits deep in the shoe. The result is a rubbing on the side of my ankle that caused me to cut a notch out of the shoe (noticeable in the picture above). Also, for me the shoes are a bit too narrow and for longer distances, as my foot swells, it rubs. This is the hurdle, for me, where these shoes fall. Raw skin and blisters should not be a part of any activity you love to do. I will speak of them no more
The Lunas have their own special rubbing points, but I’ve found if I wear toe socks for really long runs, I have no issues at all. The contact of the strap between the toes can be alleviated either that way or with a lubricant like Body Glide (NFI) and the buckle on the top of the foot can be dealt with the same way. The heel strap rubbing is eliminated (in my opinion) with the addition of a tech strap, or additional straps as shown in the picture. Once that is sorted, they are a lot of fun to run in. Sockful or sockless, running on the road or on trail is comfortable and oddly freeing. No worries about running through water or mud, it all just runs through. I do get the occasional rock, but no more than wearing shoes without gaiters, and it is considerably easier to get rid of them than completely untying the shoes. Also, after a couple of runs, they mold to the shape of your foot, which makes them feel great.
The Altras, in my opinion, fixed a lot of issues I had with the Hokas. Just as padded (in my opinion) on the bottom, MUCH wider toebox (although I haven’t run an ultra in them yet, so no idea on rubbing) and the collar around the ankle is a lot lower, so there shouldn’t be any rubbing there. The few runs I’ve taken them on have been a lot of fun and the zen-like tread pattern works well on loose dirt/gravel.
I run using the Chi method, hitting on the balls/mid foot unless my form gets sloppy. Both the Lunas and the Altras can accommodate this style as they are zero drop (no difference between the heel height and the toe height). As you can see from the pictures above, there is a slight difference in the amount of cushioning between the two :) , and that leads me to:
Finally: The conclusion
To recap, I wanted to love the Hokas, but they weren’t made for my spread out, swelling feet. If you remember, I ran Death Valley in a pair of Hokas, but switched out between them and a different model of Altras. I ended up having to cut relief holes in the Hokas to avoid re-aggravating the blisters.
The new Altra Olympus appears, at first run, to be all that was missing in the Hokas, I like the cushioning, the depth and the width. I have two races coming up in the next few months and will run at least one of them in the Altras. For me, if it’s too cold, or the course is ridiculously technical or long, I think they’ll be my go-to shoe. I like minimalist, but I’m not a masochist.
The Lunas, however, are my go-to for everything else. I love the idea of strengthening my foot muscles and running more naturally and I love how the sandals pretty quickly molded to my feet. I have over 200 miles on my current pair, and they’re still going strong.
Basically, I run because I enjoy it. I’m usually nowhere near a podium or a course record and I like to be able to walk and talk after a race, not collapse in a quivering heap. I will pick one of these shoes over the other based on the type of experience I want to have (with the exception of the Hokas, did I mention that?). If I want to bound around like a deer (or a monkey), I’ll take the Lunas, If I want to plow through a mountain, I’ll reach for Olympus. I may have found the perfect pairs of shoes for me, at opposite ends of the spectrum, but covering it all. I’m running in the swamps in Florida next week at the DWD Green Swamp 50k, so I’ll probably be monkey-ing around down there!
I have no financial interest in anything I mentioned here, but I do have friends that work for/sell both the Lunas and the Altras. If that, in your mind, constitutes a conflict of interest, I’m really sorry I wasted your time. My recommendation would be to go out and see what works for you. ;)
1 Inspired Idiot
Filed under: About my equipment | Tagged: altra, altra olympus, altra review, hoka mafate, hoka one one, hoka review, luna, luna review, monkey, Mountain, olympus, running, sandals, shoe review, ultramarathon | Leave a comment »